User talk:Billinghurst

"Da mihi basium"

This user has an alternate account named SDrewthbot.

If you are looking to get my attention, you can use a {{Ping}} that will trip my Notifications place a {{Talkback}} at the bottom of my talk page. This is big and bold and will ensure that I see it and respond.

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Unexplained revert

Why did you revert my edit at [1]? You omitted adding an explanation in the summary field. Enhancing999 (talk) 06:16, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

@Enhancing999: you removed a category redirect that was purposefully added by the move script, per its design. I am not sure why you did that either. I would think that it would be reasonably obvious why we would have a redirect for a long-existing category. FWIW my change back had as much subject summary as your edit.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

The template I added explains why the redirect should be deleted and not kept. Not all "long-existing category" should be kept as redirects. For standard users, there is no "suppress redirect" function, so the way to go is to add the template (but I guess you knew that). Enhancing999 (talk) 10:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

I did not say we would keep it because it was long-existing, I said as it was long-existing that it we would keep it. This one could not be easily found through HotCat following the change of name, and as such should be kept. The indicative nature of the category redirect should be reasonably apparent that there should be a good reason to delete it. They are not problematic, and if you think that they are problematic, we have a quite reasonable deletion request process. That you added bad name template is your opinion, it is not overtly meeting that criteria.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Enhancing999: See also COM:CATRED.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Malloween

[2]: why? What is the connection? - Jmabel ! talk 21:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

<shrug>  Done  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Text categories

Thanks for adding the nocat parameter to all those text categories. That will make it easier to work on the non-empty dab cats. Do you want any help with doing that? -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

@Auntof6: Took me a while to find that the "nocat" parameter was already coded into the template. Anyway, help yourself, I am just working through maintenance categories, none are mine, and it is nice to see them empty.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I took care of all but one of the ones that were in the non-empty dab cats. The one I didn't do was Category:New York (text). That one uses a different template, {{2 word text cat}}, that doesn't seem to have the nocat option. It's getting late so I'm not going to look at it right now, but if no one else does I'll look at it later. -- Auntof6 (talk) 09:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

@Auntof6: I have added an override for topic/$3 of nocat for {{2 word text cat}}  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! So that takes care of the ones in dab categories.

As for others, I don't know if they should be addressed. Do we ever want to categorize the text categories this way? I would think not, because they deal with pure text, not the meaning(s) of the text. The images in the text could conceivably have nothing to do with the main subject of a term, or even of any of the alternate meanings. What do you think? -- Auntof6 (talk) 21:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I haven't thought about it, though well worth the conversation. I think that the best space for these in front of the community, so here [[Com:VP]. Trying to find the balance between good categorisation, and make work; sensible <=> nonsensical; do no harm <=> focusing on best use of time.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

deletion request

Dear Billinghurst,

please delete File:Megabunus_sp_♂_adult.jpg and First_Local_Verified_Observation_Record

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elena Regina (talk • contribs) 18:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Question about closure of Mother of the seals

You recently closed a deletion discussion about a photograph taken by a colonizer of a likely coerced nude indigenous woman in favor of keeping the image by stating [t]he dignity standard would not apply to a historical photo. I would like to ask for clarification about how you arrived at this interpretation, that the guideline doesn't apply to historical photos. COM:DIGNITY does not seem to mention exceptions for historical photographs and emphasizes that that portion of the guideline is not about the legal complications that pertain to the privacy rights of living individuals but rather about how decency and respect for human dignity may influence the decision whether to host an image above that required by the law. This seemed like a case in which the provenance of an image may taint its use irredeemably. Hydrangeans (talk) 18:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

The wording of that guidance is for contemporary and personal submissions, please read and cite the whole guidance in context. As an administrator I have to assess the guidance against the purpose. The image is widely available in the public domain, we are not talking a sole copy of the image. It is not our job as administrators to reinterpret and censor history, and as such we have to look at the image in the corpus of the collection with its like works.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

I have added to my closing remark special:diff/867574829 in light of your request.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Italian discussion

Hi, can I ask you for your opinion on this discussion? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bar_italiano#API_e_IP The two categories were moved without consensus, and furthermore (as explained in the discussion) for reasons that personally seem wrong to me. I'm asking you, because you had already intervened for another category shift without consent, and no one else intervened in the discussion. I would like to have an administrator's opinion regarding both the method (lack of consensus) and the motivations (a more subjective question, which deserves further opinions). Moxmarco (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

@Moxmarco: I think that getting one of the administrators who is fluent in Italian to that page would be more appropriate. You can find someone via the list on Commons:List of administrators by language.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Deletion request

Please @Billinghurst: , kindly assist in closing the deletion nominations for these two photos: File:Ann Jane Arko Anny Photoshoot in Yellow Top in April 12 2015.jpg and File:Anny (Ann Jane Arko) on the Runway of Mercedes Benz Fashion Week.jpg Both photos in question portrays a model who lacks notable recognition or relevance within Wikipedia’s scope. They don't contribute meaningfully to any relevant article or topic. The photographer remains unknown or not an established artist in the industry as well. The the photo was uploaded for self-promotion. Moreover, it's a copyvio. Several photos uploaded by the user have been already deleted. Wikipedia aims to provide accurate and valuable information to its readers, and including images of individuals without notable recognition detracts from this objective. Newrobertsparks (talk) 14:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

@Newrobertsparks: Please don't prosecute the case on my user talk page. They have DRs, and that is enough to get the community's attention and processes.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Elena Regina

What did she do? Trade (talk) 22:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Problematic only. User keeps top loading here requests for action that don't need to be put on an admin's user talk page (as collectively managed by our processes). I'm away and don't have the ability to babysit. Seems non-English as first language and may need someone in her language to explain what I couldn't, when I tried.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Industrieschool de Wiekslag aan de Talingstraat, 1956.jpg

Hi Billinghurst, thanks for all your work here. I wonder if you could reconsider this refert. I uploaded the same image twice from the same source, the original (6.5 months ago) and the trimmed version (I uploaded yesterday). There seem to be no reason to keep the untrimmed version, but maybe I am mistaken about the Wikimedia policy. -- Mdd (talk) 10:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

@Mdd: The file does not qualify for speedy deletion as duplicate for numbers of reasons. You can nominate it for a standard deletion per the polich, though I don't see any issue with both versions being available and letting users decide which they wish to use. Free choice is a marvellous thing.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanx, this is fine with me and I will keep this rationale in mind. Best regards, Mdd (talk) 14:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Removal of files from Category:Höltigbaum

I placed the files intentionally in the disambiguation category that they can be found and maybe identified and sorted into the correct category. Now they are totally uncategorized. GPSLeo (talk) 18:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

@GPSLeo: Please do not categorise to disambiguation categories, that is totally against the practice. The purpose is to empty those categories. If required, please create the category for where they belong. If it is not known to how they should be categorised, then they probably are lacking educational purpose and should be considered for deletion. If you cannot get them exact to such a term, then look to use the other aspects of the country which apply.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @GPSLeo: Or you can create a maintenance category somewhere appropriate under Category:Unidentified locations. - Jmabel ! talk 01:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion requests

Why is File:Bradley square mall entrance 1991-2012.jpg and related images not eligible for speedy deletion? As the original uploader, I'd like them deleted. Bneu2013 (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

@Bneu2013: 2017 files. Please reread Com:CSD for the criteria for speedy deletion, it fails. Take-backs have a very short shelf-life.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Ok. I thought I've had another one from that time deleted. The issue is, I think they may be copyright violations. To the best of my knowledge, they came from Flickr (I probably incorrectly attributed them to myself), but someone else has determined that a lot of my uploads from this time belong to Google. I can't confirm that, but I couldn't find them on Flickr anymore, and there's no reason to have this many images of these subjects anyway. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

@Bneu2013: I doubt they belong to Google. They are not eligible for speedy on the criteria you provided. Com:Deletion requests is the process now.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Another user has since confirmed that all of the Greenway photos have come from Google maps. Since I can't find evidence of them being freely licensed elsewhere, they need to be deleted. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)