Commons:Photography critiques

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
 SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 90 days.

color palette logo Welcome to the Photography critiques!

COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES (index)

Would you like a second opinion before nominating a photograph of yours as a Quality Image, Valued Image or Featured Picture candidate, can't decide which of your images to enter into one of the Photo Challenges? Or do you have specific questions about how to improve your photography or just would like some general feedback?

This is the right page to gather other people's opinions!


Update this page
Update this page


Start a new topic

If you want general suggestions to a good photo, you can ask here, and we already wrote guidelines.

See image guidelines >>

If you don't get some terminology used here, don't be shy you can ask about it, or read

See photography terms >>

Please insert new entries at the bottom, and comment on oldest entries first.

To prevent archiving use {{subst:DNAU}}, because SpBot archives all sections after 90 days, unless archiving has been postponed or suppressed through the use of {{subst:DNAU}}. You can ask the bot to archive a section earlier by using {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} – then it will be archived after 7 days.


Archive


Woodmoor, Maryland[edit]

I've been using my iPhone to take images of places in Silver Spring. Around two months ago, I took this image one of Woodmoor's welcome signs:

I would like some feedback on this. Thanks, Davest3r08 (talk) 19:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The shadows in the foreground are distracting. Some combination of getting closer to the sign, choosing a different time of day, tighter crop, and/or changing the angle could address this issue. Buidhe (talk) 19:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to the design flaws already described by Buidhe, the photo shows an inhomogeneous impression of sharpness. Areas with high contrast appear over-sharpened, whereas the algorithm apparently found no edges in the central lettering that it could process. As a result, the letters appear blurrier than the leaves, meadow and everything else around them. --Smial (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Macaca mulatta eating a Citrus[edit]

Hello everyone, I recently resubmitted an image for Featured Picture nomination and you can find it here. The feedback mentioned concerns regarding incorrect color balance, sharpness, and definition, I corrected the color balance but rest are out of hands. Despite trying various settings such as ISO at 100 and a shutter speed of 1/150, I'm still encountering sharpness issues in my images. I'm curious to understand whether the problem lies in my technique or the resolution of my beginner-level camera, the Canon EOS 200D/Rebel/SL2.--iMahesh (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's a few things about your technique you can improve before hitting the limit of your equipment:
- Increase shutter speed: 1/100s or 1/150s is risky at 200mm+, particularly for subjects that are not completely still. Turn on Auto-ISO, burst mode, and continuous AF. Take a few shots at ~1/640s, then ~1/320s, then ~1/160s. Back in the computer, see what is the lowest shutter speed that still gets you good sharpness, and use that as a reference for future sessions. Still, always take multiple shots of the same subject: even with adequate settings and good technique, things often go wrong
- Nail the focus: this image seems slightly front-focused i.e. the plane of focus seems to be on the orange and not on the head. Make sure you put the AF point on the head
- Try out new AI tools: software such as Adobe's Denoise AI or DXO's DeepPrime will do wonders for high ISO shots. Most of the wildlife shots you see these days at FPC use these tools, give them a go!
--Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Julesvernex2: thanks for revert will keep these points in mind: Checking shutter speeds w.r.t lighting, Manual/Touch focus instead of letting camera to find the subject, Trying Auto ISO for few days to understand the values, checking AI tools (but should keep in mind not to alter image way too much). --iMahesh (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome, ping me if there's something you want to detail further. As for these specific AI tools: they replace the traditional Raw demosaicing algorithms and are non-generative, so shouldn't structurally alter the image. However, keep an eye out for artefacts and aliasing on fine details (e.g., these wing feathers) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Julesvernex2: I tried out denoise and slightly modified the image, I think its got good quality now. --iMahesh (talk) 12:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, nice job! Clean background and additional detail on the subject, without artefacts. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it looks perfect. The focus on the orange seems due as its also the focus of the monkey. Tao.contracting.229 (talk) 05:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outdoor tiles in Baguio[edit]

I'm just getting started at photography, just need some feedback. Please note, the camera I'm using (Canon Digital IXUS 40) auto focuses, and I cannot control it. Dentsinhere43 (talk) 11:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My skiing photo[edit]

How do you like this photo? It's me in the photo. I took it back in 2020. I just uploaded it to use in the Wikipedia article about "Goggles" to show the reader what a person wearing ski goggles looks like.

Félix An (talk) 05:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good man. An accurate portrayal of googles. Tao.contracting.229 (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Photography_critiques&oldid=871096624"